Estudo clínico randomizado duplo cego comparando duas técnicas de plicatura nasal após osteotomias tipo Le Fort I

Abstract

Correction of skeletic deformities through a surgical-orthodontic approach hás become a safe and predictable option. Bone movements are meticulously calculated and surgically executed, while the occlusion is tightly adjusted through orthodontic movements. Soft tissue response to orthognathic surgery are, however, less predictable, and although the purpose of the orthognathic surgery is to improve function, the cosmetic component is undoubtedly of extreme importance. In special the alar base region presents variables results, regardless of the good skeletic results achieved. The objective of this trial was to compare 2 different sutures applied to the alar base region, and to analyze which one would present a better result. Thirty Five patients were randomly distributed into 2 groups. Group 1 received the intraoral nasal plicature, and worked as the control group, since this is the most conventional type of suture applied to this region. Patients from group 2 received an extra oral nasal plicature. The statistical analysis was performed comparing the mean and standard deviation of both groups. Also, the null hypothesis that there was no difference between the groups was tested with T Student s test. Both groups presented wider nasal bases in the postoperative. However, group 1 mean was 2.50 millimeters (mm), while group 2 mean was 1.26. Besides, standard deviation was lower in the experimental group, and the null hypothesis was rejected (p<.05), showing a statistical difference between the groups. It can be concluded that when the purpose is to have a more predictable and rigorous control of the alar base width, the extra oral plicature will work better.