Condição humana: rumo ao terrestre através de migração, cultura e vulnerabilidade

Abstract

This Dissertation begins from the broad view of the human condition (ARENDT, 1979, 2000), and the concepts of migration, culture, vulnerability, and their consequences. From migration studies, themes such as climate regime, towards the terrestrial (LATOUR, 2020a, 2020b; SILVA & SILVA, 2020), agenda for humanity (OCHA, 2018), universal passport (HINDRIKS, 2021), and the new term proposed “deEARTHtorialize”. Through culture, content is elucidated transgenerationally (REHBEIN; CHATELARD, 2013), cultural identity, subjectivation processes (HALL, 2003, 2006), territory, deterritorialization, multiterritorialization (HAESBAERT, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2014), non-places (AUGE, 1992). From the analysis of the vulnerability, topics such as doomed trajectories, existential risks (BOSTROM, 2002), intersectionalities (CRENSHAW, 2002), biopolitical power (FOUCAULT, 2005, 2006, 2010), racism, intolerance, stereotypes, xenophobia (HARARI, 2015, 2018), genocide (STANTON, 2016). Qualitative research was carried out with a methodological character of narrative literature review, contemplating varied collections. In the end, as a conjunction of the three central themes, an atypical phenomenon during the Covid-19 Pandemic stands out, in the area of migratory camps on the planet: the self-named camp “Campo de Refugiados 1º de Maio”. On the soil of the city of Itaguaí, the “local and the global” met in a different, unequal, and disconnected version (CANCLINI, 2005). Its origin denounces and accentuates the precarious conditions of three thousand families, among Brazilian internally displaced people, coming mostly from the West Zone of Rio de Janeiro and various places of origin, together with migrants of different nationalities (Angolan, Chilean, Haitian, Nigerian, Portuguese and Venezuelans). They call themselves refugees, although different from the UN-centric legislative concept, as they consider that they were taking refuge from the pandemic, genocide, hunger, unemployment, and misery. Although with the support of popular and political movements, it did not obtain international recognition and, despite exerting strong resistance to become a settlement, it was deterritorialized by the mechanisms of Brazilian public policies of reception, without reaching the full coverage of the vulnerable intersectionalities. The link between the studies lies in how the environment and territories interfere in the restructuring of migrants, considering the primordial needs of survival, amid the formulation of new identities in the face of the original culture. Feelings such as affection, empathy, and respect, accompanied by measures of reception, inclusion, and citizenship formation, as well as the need to move towards a common land, are taken as provoking transformations and maintenance of the human condition. After all, what is the future geopolitical route of mass cooperation necessary to achieve unlimited, universal, and true mobility?