Direito à excepcionalidade da vingança policial: uma análise da manifestação de poder excepcional e arbitrário em Giorgio Agamben no caso Curió

Abstract

Antônio Alisson Inácio Cardoso, Jardel Lima dos Santos, Pedro Alcântara Barroso do Nascimento Filho, Alef Souza Cavalcante, Marcelo da Silva Mendes, Patrício João Pinho Leite, Renayson Girão da Silva, Jandson Alexandre de Sousa, Valmir Ferreira da Conceição, Francisco Elenildo Pereira Chagas e José Gilvan Pinto Barbosa they are “the eleven of Curió”, the fatal victims of what was the biggest police massacre in the State of Ceará, the “Chacina do Curió”. A group of police officers, representatives of the State, whose oath of service is the protection and care of life, in an action to avenge the death of a colleague in uniform, instituted, in an exceptional state of power, norms that prevail in that community of Curió, defined who deserved to live and who would die on the night of November 11, 2012. Giorgio Agamben teaches a State of Exception constituted by the validity of a lawless force of law, which validated the action of revenge of the executors of the “Chacina do Curió” . In this work, using descriptive bibliographical and documentary research as research instruments to obtain fundamental data, I propose to investigate the police revenge in the Curió case as a model of those that occur in response to the death of fellow police officers, as an expression of exceptional power and arbitrary. Giorgio Agamben's doctrine guides this study to explain that the “Bullfinch Massacre” reflected a legal exceptionality, guided by norms established by groups that claim control over lives, in an exceptional situation.